Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.
Reference: official site